- CSIC
- 34915854421
- Viewpoint Contributors
- Spain
About Isabel Varela Nieto
Dr. Isabel Varela-Nieto graduated and earned her doctorate in Chemistry, Biochemistry Section, at the University Complutense of Madrid (Spain). She has been a visiting guest scientist at the Medical Schools of Uppsala (FEBS Fellow, Sweden) and San Diego (MEC Sabbatical, USA). She is Professor of Research at the CSIC and group leader at the CIBER of rare diseases (CIBERER, ISCIII) in Madrid. From the early 1990s she has been studying hearing neurobiology and IGF-1 actions. She was the first Chair of the SEBBM Science for Society working group with which she actively collaborates. She is currently the president of the SEBBM and a member of the FEBS Network working group and FEBS Science and Society Committee.
Research Interest
FEBS Constituent Society
Other Expertise/Interests
Followed by
Consuelo Guerri
Researcher and Head of Cell Pathology Laboratory, Reserach Center Prince Felipe
PRASADA RAO KONGALA
PROFESSOR, SAM HIGGINBOTTOM UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE,TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCES
Popular contributions
FEBS Network special areas
Channels contributed to:
VIEWPOINTSRooms participated in:
Outreach activities: advice, resources and ideas for life scientistsOnline Elsewhere
Others with similar interests
Rosemary Kathleen Clyne
Senior Lecturer in Biomedical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London
Recent Comments
Inspiring post!
TjThanks Miguel A, food for thought! ... there is no doubt that many activities will change and we will learn that they can be done remotely. But undoubtedly, personal interaction increases comm...
If you work in biomedicine, you should read this article and those recommended...
Great tool, thank you very much for sharing!
Great idea! Poster Pitch, looking forward to it
Bravo! Let´s follow this lead and be careful about how we use language.
I totally agree, the pace at which pseudosciences advance is a matter of great worry and it is important to have channels, as this one, to create awareness.
Food for thought! Indeed it is a topic with many facets and open for discussion.
Which should we use as a reference index to objectively evaluate the impact of colleagues' work?